VCG MYM I LLC v. SUNRISE LAND PARTNERS, LLLP, MATTAMY JACKSONVILLE, LLC, MATTAMY ORLANDO, LLC, MATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA, LLC, MATTAMY FLORIDA, LLC
This text of VCG MYM I LLC v. SUNRISE LAND PARTNERS, LLLP, MATTAMY JACKSONVILLE, LLC, MATTAMY ORLANDO, LLC, MATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA, LLC, MATTAMY FLORIDA, LLC (VCG MYM I LLC v. SUNRISE LAND PARTNERS, LLLP, MATTAMY JACKSONVILLE, LLC, MATTAMY ORLANDO, LLC, MATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA, LLC, MATTAMY FLORIDA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D23-1201 Lower Tribunal No. 2020-CA-003839-O _____________________________
VCG MYM I LLC,
Appellant, v.
SUNRISE LAND PARTNERS, LLLP, MATTAMY JACKSONVILLE, LLC, MATTAMY ORLANDO, LLC, MATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA, LLC, MATTAMY FLORIDA, LLC, Appellees.
_____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. John E. Jordan, Judge.
November 9, 2023
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Alvarez v. Rendon, 953 So. 2d 702, 709 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
(“An anticipatory breach of contract occurs before the time has come when there is
a present duty to perform as the result of words or acts evincing an intention to refuse
performance in the future.”); Craigside, LLC v. GDC View, LLC, 74 So. 3d 1087,
1090 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“Craigside unequivocally informed GDC that Craigside
was not going to close . . . . In doing so, Craigside communicated an anticipatory
repudiation which breached the agreement.”); U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n as Tr. for Lehman XS Tr. Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-16N v. Devoe, 315
So. 3d 1232, 1235 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (“Generally, in a non-jury trial, this Court
will defer to the trial court’s findings of fact so long as those findings are supported
by competent substantial evidence.”); Sinclair v. Sinclair, 804 So. 2d 589, 592 (Fla.
2d DCA 2002) (holding that in nonjury case, it is not for appellate court to reweigh
evidence or substitute its judgment for that of trial court).1
TRAVER, C.J., and NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur.
Jesse Panuccio, of Boies Schiller Flexner, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.
Peter J. McGinley, of Dechert, LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Steven A. Engel, of Dechert, LLP, Washington, D.C., Pro Hac Vice, for Appellant.
Julissa Rodriguez, of Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Miami, and Eric C. Reed, Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Orlando, for Appellees.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
1 This case was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
VCG MYM I LLC v. SUNRISE LAND PARTNERS, LLLP, MATTAMY JACKSONVILLE, LLC, MATTAMY ORLANDO, LLC, MATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA, LLC, MATTAMY FLORIDA, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vcg-mym-i-llc-v-sunrise-land-partners-lllp-mattamy-jacksonville-llc-fladistctapp-2023.