Vazquez v. Vazquez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vazquez v. Vazquez

736 So. 2d 808, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9637, 1999 WL 510631

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 21, 1999

DocketNo. 98-2530

StatusPublished

This text of 736 So. 2d 808 (Vazquez v. Vazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vazquez v. Vazquez, 736 So. 2d 808, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9637, 1999 WL 510631 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former husband appeals from both the “Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage” and the subsequently entered “Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees.” The former was entered by the trial court after it vacated a previously entered “Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage” which incorporated the parties’ settlement agreement.

In view of the fact that the record does not support the entry of the Order by the trial court setting aside the initial “Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage”, we reverse the said Order and remand this cause with directions to reinstate that judgment. As a consequence thereof, the “Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolu[809]*809tion of Marriage” and the “Judgment for Attorneys” Fees must also be vacated.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former husband appeals from both the “Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage” and the subsequently entered “Judgment for Attorneys’ Fees.” The former was entered by the trial court after it vacated a previously entered “Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage” which incorporated the parties’ settlement agreement.

In view of the fact that the record does not support the entry of the Order by the trial court setting aside the initial “Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage”, we reverse the said Order and remand this cause with directions to reinstate that judgment. As a consequence thereof, the “Supplemental Final Judgment of Dissolu[809]*809tion of Marriage” and the “Judgment for Attorneys” Fees must also be vacated.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 So. 2d 808, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9637, 1999 WL 510631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vazquez-v-vazquez-fladistctapp-1999.