Vázquez v. Padró

30 P.R. 925
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided April 4, 1922·No. No. 2710·Published

Opinion

District Court of Ponce. Damages.

Motion by the appellee for dismissal. There being no statement of the case and the transcript not having been filed in time, the motion was sustained. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vázquez v. Padró, 30 P.R. 925 (prsupreme 1922).

30 P.R. 925 (Vázquez v. Padró) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.