Vazquez v. Integon Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vazquez v. Integon Insurance

280 A.D.2d 606, 720 N.Y.S.2d 803, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 280 A.D.2d 606 (Vazquez v. Integon Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vazquez v. Integon Insurance, 280 A.D.2d 606, 720 N.Y.S.2d 803, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award dated October 15, 1999, the appeal is from an order of [607]*607the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated June 27, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the arbitration award is reinstated.

The petitioners failed to establish that the award should be vacated on any of the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511. Moreover, the award is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v MVAIC, 251 AD2d 580). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award dated October 15, 1999, the appeal is from an order of [607]*607the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated June 27, 2000, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the arbitration award is reinstated.

The petitioners failed to establish that the award should be vacated on any of the grounds set forth in CPLR 7511. Moreover, the award is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co. v MVAIC, 251 AD2d 580). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 606, 720 N.Y.S.2d 803, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vazquez-v-integon-insurance-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack