Vazquez v. Gonzales
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals did not err in summarily dismissing petitioner’s appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
218 F. App'x 677 (Vazquez v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.