Vazquez v. Dilido Hotel

Supreme Court of Florida

Vazquez v. Dilido Hotel

196 So. 2d 744, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3978

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 1967

DocketNo. 36104

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 744 (Vazquez v. Dilido Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vazquez v. Dilido Hotel, 196 So. 2d 744, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3978 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 15, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and O’CON- . NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents with Opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI