Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG
This text of Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG (Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
BRENDA I. VAZQUEZ, CHRISTINE V. : No. 68 WM 2020 FARNSTROM, VERONICA GARCIA, IRAIS : J. HERNANDEZ, DEVRI V. HOWARD, : MISTY D. HUNTER, MICHELLE L. JUDD, : NATASHA M. RITCH, CLAUDIA GARNICA : SERRATOS, SHANNON CARIE, KENDRA : CLOUTIER, CHELSEA COOPER, APRIL : GARCIA, COLEEN MORANOR, MELENIE : SANDER, JACRISSA STEVENSON, : MIRIAM ZUNIGA, MELISSA TOLLEY, : KRISTEN GALO, CAROLE CARAMELA : : : v. : : : BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER U.S. LLC; : BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC; BAYER : ESSURE INC; BAYER HERALTHCARE : PHARMACEUTICALS INC; BAYER AG; : BAYER PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; : AND BAYER S.A. : : : PETITION OF: BAYER AG; BAYER : PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; AND : BAYER S.A. :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal,
treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vazquez-v-bayer-corp-pet-of-bayer-ag-pa-2020.