Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
BRENDA I. VAZQUEZ, CHRISTINE V. : No. 68 WM 2020 FARNSTROM, VERONICA GARCIA, IRAIS : J. HERNANDEZ, DEVRI V. HOWARD, : MISTY D. HUNTER, MICHELLE L. JUDD, : NATASHA M. RITCH, CLAUDIA GARNICA : SERRATOS, SHANNON CARIE, KENDRA : CLOUTIER, CHELSEA COOPER, APRIL : GARCIA, COLEEN MORANOR, MELENIE : SANDER, JACRISSA STEVENSON, : MIRIAM ZUNIGA, MELISSA TOLLEY, : KRISTEN GALO, CAROLE CARAMELA :
: :
v. :
: :
BAYER CORPORATION; BAYER U.S. LLC; : BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC; BAYER : ESSURE INC; BAYER HERALTHCARE : PHARMACEUTICALS INC; BAYER AG; : BAYER PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; : AND BAYER S.A. :
: :
PETITION OF: BAYER AG; BAYER : PHARMA AG; CONCEPTUS SAS; AND : BAYER S.A. :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal,
treated as a Petition for Review, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG (Vazquez v. Bayer Corp., Pet of: Bayer AG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.