Vaval v. State
This text of 792 So. 2d 649 (Vaval v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
792 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12137, 2001 WL 984491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaval-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.