Vaval v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vaval v. State

792 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12137, 2001 WL 984491

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2001·No. No. 3D01-1729·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. See Saldana v. State, 786 So.2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (“Advising a defendant that he or she is under investigation is not the same thing as being threatened with deportation.”); see also Kindelan v. State, 786 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). This affirmance is without prejudice to defendant refiling his 3.850 motion should the investigation lead to the threat of deportation.

Vaval v. State, 792 So. 2d 649, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12137, 2001 WL 984491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

792 So. 2d 649 (Vaval v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related