Vaux v. Vaux

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vaux v. Vaux

385 So. 2d 179, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23716

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1980

DocketNo. 80-689

StatusPublished

This text of 385 So. 2d 179 (Vaux v. Vaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaux v. Vaux, 385 So. 2d 179, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In January, 1980, Mr. and Mrs. Vaux instituted separate, subsequently consolidated, domestic actions against each other in the Dade County Circuit Court. Two months later, after extensive activity in the Dade County proceedings, the husband moved to transfer the cases to St. Lucie County under the forum non conveniens statute, Section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1979). We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of that motion. See McGraw-Edison Co. v. Van Pelt, 350 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1965); McMichael v. Harris, 127 Fla. 861, 174 So. 323 (1937); Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis, P. A. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n., Inc., 371 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Bassett v. Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc., 362 So.2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1979); Velez v. Mell D. Leonard & Associates, Inc., 338 So.2d 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In January, 1980, Mr. and Mrs. Vaux instituted separate, subsequently consolidated, domestic actions against each other in the Dade County Circuit Court. Two months later, after extensive activity in the Dade County proceedings, the husband moved to transfer the cases to St. Lucie County under the forum non conveniens statute, Section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1979). We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of that motion. See McGraw-Edison Co. v. Van Pelt, 350 F.2d 361 (8th Cir. 1965); McMichael v. Harris, 127 Fla. 861, 174 So. 323 (1937); Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis, P. A. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass’n., Inc., 371 So.2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Bassett v. Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc., 362 So.2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So.2d 1374 (Fla.1979); Velez v. Mell D. Leonard & Associates, Inc., 338 So.2d 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 So. 2d 179, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaux-v-vaux-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack