Vaught v. McNeil

16 So. 3d 897, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10117, 2009 WL 2191373
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 2009
Docket1D08-3739
StatusPublished

This text of 16 So. 3d 897 (Vaught v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaught v. McNeil, 16 So. 3d 897, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10117, 2009 WL 2191373 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We affirm as to two issues but remand to the trial court to amend its order to indicate it is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file an amended complaint on the declaratory judgment and to effectuate appropriate process pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(j).

WOLF, WEBSTER, and CLARK, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metro Injury & Rehab Center
16 So. 3d 897 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 So. 3d 897, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10117, 2009 WL 2191373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaught-v-mcneil-fladistctapp-2009.