Vaughn v. Vaughn

88 N.E.2d 273, 55 Ohio Law. Abs. 302, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 825

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vaughn v. Vaughn. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Ohio Law. Abs. 563 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 1949·No. No. 4284·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per CURIAM.

Finding no error in the record prejudicial to the appellant, the judgment is affirmed.

See also 54 Abs 563.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn v. Vaughn, 88 N.E.2d 273, 55 Ohio Law. Abs. 302, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 825 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

88 N.E.2d 273 (Vaughn v. Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

88 N.E.2d 272 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1949)