Vaughn v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Vaughn v. State

193 Ga. 282

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 13, 1942

DocketNo. 13968

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ga. 282 (Vaughn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughn v. State, 193 Ga. 282 (Ga. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder by running over and killing a named person with an automobile, and on the trial was convicted of the offense charged. His motion for a new trial based solely upon the general grounds was overruled, and he excepted. Beld, that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, [283]*283and the judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous as contended. See Butler v. State, 178 Ga. 700 (173 S. E. 856); Jones v. State, 185 Ga. 68 (194 S. E. 216); Meadows v. State, 186 Ga. 592 (199 S. E. 133). The case differs on its facts from Ivey v. State, 191 Ga. 461 (12 S. E. 2d, 879). Judgment affirmed.

No. 13968. January 13, 1942. All the Justices concur. Kelly & Hicks, for plaintiff in error. milis G. Amall, attorney-general, Henderson Lanham, solicitor-general, m. J. Glower and G. m. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Justice.

The defendant was indicted for the offense of murder by running over and killing a named person with an automobile, and on the trial was convicted of the offense charged. His motion for a new trial based solely upon the general grounds was overruled, and he excepted. Beld, that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, [283]*283and the judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous as contended. See Butler v. State, 178 Ga. 700 (173 S. E. 856); Jones v. State, 185 Ga. 68 (194 S. E. 216); Meadows v. State, 186 Ga. 592 (199 S. E. 133). The case differs on its facts from Ivey v. State, 191 Ga. 461 (12 S. E. 2d, 879). Judgment affirmed.

No. 13968. January 13, 1942. All the Justices concur. Kelly & Hicks, for plaintiff in error. milis G. Amall, attorney-general, Henderson Lanham, solicitor-general, m. J. Glower and G. m. Gregory Jr., assistant attorneys-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ga. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-state-ga-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack