Vaughn v. Segal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vaughn v. Segal

707 So. 2d 951, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 1998 WL 130945

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1998

DocketNos. 97-1499, 97-819

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 707 So. 2d 951 (Vaughn v. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughn v. Segal, 707 So. 2d 951, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 1998 WL 130945 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rene Vaughn appeals the dismissal of her lawsuit against the adjacent property owner for damage caused by trees encroaching on plaintiff-appellant’s property. This court has previously held that there is no cause of action in such circumstances for nuisance, see Gallo v. Heller, 512 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), or negligence. See Richmond v. General Eng’g Enters. Co., 454 So.2d 16, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Plaintiff contends, however, that there is a private right of action under chapter 19 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade [952]*952County, entitled “Lot Junk, Garbage and Trash Clearing.” Plaintiff argues that a violation of this ordinance amounts to negligence per se and that she may base a lawsuit on the ordinance. We disagree.

Writing in the context of a statute, the Florida Supreme Court has said, “Today ... most courts generally look to the legislative intent of a statute to determine whether a private cause of action should be judicially inferred.” Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 644 So.2d 983, 985 (Fla.1994) (citations omitted); see also Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The same logic applies to a local ordinance. Here, the ordinance sets up a list of prohibited conditions, establishes a schedule of required maintenance, and provides for enforcement by the county authorities. See Metropolitan Dade County Code §§ 19-4 to -7. Civil penalties may be assessed through the county’s code enforcement procedures. See id. § 19-10. We find no intention to create a private cause of action under this county ordinance.

For the reasons stated, the dismissal of the plaintiffs action is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rene Vaughn appeals the dismissal of her lawsuit against the adjacent property owner for damage caused by trees encroaching on plaintiff-appellant’s property. This court has previously held that there is no cause of action in such circumstances for nuisance, see Gallo v. Heller, 512 So.2d 215, 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), or negligence. See Richmond v. General Eng’g Enters. Co., 454 So.2d 16, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Plaintiff contends, however, that there is a private right of action under chapter 19 of the Code of Metropolitan Dade [952]*952County, entitled “Lot Junk, Garbage and Trash Clearing.” Plaintiff argues that a violation of this ordinance amounts to negligence per se and that she may base a lawsuit on the ordinance. We disagree.

Writing in the context of a statute, the Florida Supreme Court has said, “Today ... most courts generally look to the legislative intent of a statute to determine whether a private cause of action should be judicially inferred.” Murthy v. N. Sinha Corp., 644 So.2d 983, 985 (Fla.1994) (citations omitted); see also Fischer v. Metcalf, 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The same logic applies to a local ordinance. Here, the ordinance sets up a list of prohibited conditions, establishes a schedule of required maintenance, and provides for enforcement by the county authorities. See Metropolitan Dade County Code §§ 19-4 to -7. Civil penalties may be assessed through the county’s code enforcement procedures. See id. § 19-10. We find no intention to create a private cause of action under this county ordinance.

For the reasons stated, the dismissal of the plaintiffs action is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

707 So. 2d 951, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2898, 1998 WL 130945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-segal-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack