Vaughn v. Ross
This text of 89 A.D.2d 602 (Vaughn v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for assault, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated October 2, 1981, which denied his motion to dismiss the action and granted plaintiff’s cross motion to compel defendant to accept service of the verified complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, cross motion denied and the action is dismissed. Plaintiff offers nothing more than law office [603]*603failure to explain the delay in serving the complaint. Law office failure is legally insufficient to excuse the instant delay (Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594; Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U. S., 56 NY2d 900; Bruno v Village of Port Chester, 77 AD2d 580). Gibbons, J. P., Weinstein, Gulotta and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.2d 602, 452 N.Y.S.2d 464, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-ross-nyappdiv-1982.