Vaughn v. National Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 234 S.E.2d 718 (Vaughn v. National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant guarantors, having consented in advance in a clause of the guaranty agreement that the creditor could surrender or release the reserve account held as security for payment of the debts guaranteed, cannot now successfully contend that they were discharged by the act of the creditor in applying it to the obligations [898]*898guaranteed. Dunlap v. C & S DeKalb Bank, 134 Ga. App. 893, 896 (216 SE2d 651) (1975) and cits.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 S.E.2d 718, 141 Ga. App. 897, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-national-bank-trust-co-gactapp-1977.