Vaughn v. National Bank & Trust Co.
234 S.E.2d 718, 141 Ga. App. 897, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2111
Opinion
Defendant guarantors, having consented in advance in a clause of the guaranty agreement that the creditor could surrender or release the reserve account held as security for payment of the debts guaranteed, cannot now successfully contend that they were discharged by the act of the creditor in applying it to the obligations [898]*898guaranteed. Dunlap v. C & S DeKalb Bank, 134 Ga. App. 893, 896 (216 SE2d 651) (1975) and cits.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vaughn v. National Bank & Trust Co., 234 S.E.2d 718, 141 Ga. App. 897, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2111 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).
234 S.E.2d 718 (Vaughn v. National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Vickers v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
280 S.E.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)