Vaughn v. . Deloatch

65 N.C. 378
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 N.C. 378 (Vaughn v. . Deloatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughn v. . Deloatch, 65 N.C. 378 (N.C. 1871).

Opinion

Read®, J.

The only question is, whether real estate is assets to pay debts before the same has been sold, and the proceeds received by the administrator ?

Recent decisions settle the question in the negative. 64 N. C. R., Fike v. Green, and the cases there cited.

*379 It may be, that in a case oí negligence the administrator would be liable on his bond for not obtaining license and selling ; but that is not before us.

There is error.

Pee Cueiam. Venire ele novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. . Bynum
92 N.C. 717 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
Hawkins v. . Carpenter
88 N.C. 403 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.C. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-deloatch-nc-1871.