Vaughn v. . Deloatch
65 N.C. 378
Opinion
The only question is, whether real estate is assets to pay debts before the same has been sold, and the proceeds received by the administrator ?
Recent decisions settle the question in the negative. 64 N. C. R., Fike v. Green, and the cases there cited.
*379 It may be, that in a case oí negligence the administrator would be liable on his bond for not obtaining license and selling ; but that is not before us.
There is error.
Pee Cueiam. Venire ele novo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vaughn v. . Deloatch, 65 N.C. 378 (N.C. 1871).
65 N.C. 378 (Vaughn v. . Deloatch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. . Bynum
92 N.C. 717 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
Hawkins v. . Carpenter
88 N.C. 403 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1883)