Vaughn v. Crosby

909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12227, 2005 WL 1844507
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 5, 2005
DocketNo. 1D04-4202
StatusPublished

This text of 909 So. 2d 394 (Vaughn v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughn v. Crosby, 909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12227, 2005 WL 1844507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s concession of error, the order transferring appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus to his sentencing court is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the circuit court for consideration of the merits of appellant’s petition. See Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

KAHN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgess v. Crosby
870 So. 2d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Davidson v. Crosby
883 So. 2d 866 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
909 So. 2d 394, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12227, 2005 WL 1844507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2005.