Vaughn v. Bass

Alabama Court of Appeals

Vaughn v. Bass

64 So. 543, 10 Ala. App. 388, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 213

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 3, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 So. 543 (Vaughn v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughn v. Bass, 64 So. 543, 10 Ala. App. 388, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 213 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The evidence adduced on the trial showed that the note sued on was given by the appellant (defendant below) in settlement of three accounts, two of them against her deceased husband and one against herself, the note being for less than the aggregate of the three debts. The evidence failed to support the pleas setting up a total and partial absence of consideration to support the note. There -was no evidence of the insolvency of the deceased husband’s estate, or that he had any children. For aught that appears his estate may have been solvent and the appellant as his widow may have been entitled to the whole of it. —Code, §§ 3754, 3763. If so, it was a benefit to her to secure the satisfaction of debts for the payment of [390]*390■which that estate could have been subjected and a detriment to the owner of such claims to discharge them. It was not made to appear that property to which the appellant ivas entitled could not have been subjected to the payment of the entire amount of the three accounts. In these particulars the instant case is strikingly unlike those of Maull v. Yaughn, 45 Ala. 134, and Hetherington v. Hixon, 46 Ala. 297, upon which the counsel for appellant relies. The burden ivas upon the defendant to support her pleas setting up an absence of consideration to support the note. This she failed to do.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, P. J.

The evidence adduced on the trial showed that the note sued on was given by the appellant (defendant below) in settlement of three accounts, two of them against her deceased husband and one against herself, the note being for less than the aggregate of the three debts. The evidence failed to support the pleas setting up a total and partial absence of consideration to support the note. There -was no evidence of the insolvency of the deceased husband’s estate, or that he had any children. For aught that appears his estate may have been solvent and the appellant as his widow may have been entitled to the whole of it. —Code, §§ 3754, 3763. If so, it was a benefit to her to secure the satisfaction of debts for the payment of [390]*390■which that estate could have been subjected and a detriment to the owner of such claims to discharge them. It was not made to appear that property to which the appellant ivas entitled could not have been subjected to the payment of the entire amount of the three accounts. In these particulars the instant case is strikingly unlike those of Maull v. Yaughn, 45 Ala. 134, and Hetherington v. Hixon, 46 Ala. 297, upon which the counsel for appellant relies. The burden ivas upon the defendant to support her pleas setting up an absence of consideration to support the note. This she failed to do.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 So. 543, 10 Ala. App. 388, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-v-bass-alactapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack