Vaughn & Co. v. Garland

Supreme Court of Virginia

Vaughn & Co. v. Garland

11 Va. 260

DecidedJuly 15, 1840

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Va. 260 (Vaughn & Co. v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughn & Co. v. Garland, 11 Va. 260 (Va. 1840).

Pincite

Opinion

Tucker, P.

This case presents essentially the question decided in M’Farland v. Hunter, 8 Leigh, 489. In that case, it is true, the question raised by the bill of exceptions was not as to the admissibility of the interrogatories, and of the answers to them, but as to their conclusiveness. This court, however, went into the question, whether it was competent to the respondent to the interrogatories to introduce them, in invitum, as evidence in his favour. After two arguments, and taking twelve months to consider, a court of three decided unanimously in the negative. I have carefully re-examined the opinions in that case, and am fully satisfied with the decision. The result must, therefore, be a reversal of the judgment, and the award of a new trial, on which the answers of the defendant to the interrogatories filed in the cause are not to be read, unless introduced on the part of the plaintiffs.

Per curiam—Judgment reversed and new trial AWARDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker, P.

This case presents essentially the question decided in M’Farland v. Hunter, 8 Leigh, 489. In that case, it is true, the question raised by the bill of exceptions was not as to the admissibility of the interrogatories, and of the answers to them, but as to their conclusiveness. This court, however, went into the question, whether it was competent to the respondent to the interrogatories to introduce them, in invitum, as evidence in his favour. After two arguments, and taking twelve months to consider, a court of three decided unanimously in the negative. I have carefully re-examined the opinions in that case, and am fully satisfied with the decision. The result must, therefore, be a reversal of the judgment, and the award of a new trial, on which the answers of the defendant to the interrogatories filed in the cause are not to be read, unless introduced on the part of the plaintiffs.

Per curiam—Judgment reversed and new trial AWARDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Va. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughn-co-v-garland-va-1840.