Vaughan v. WILLOWBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Vaughan v. WILLOWBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

262 S.W.3d 261, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1131, 2008 WL 3898949

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 2008

DocketED 90470

StatusPublished

This text of 262 S.W.3d 261 (Vaughan v. WILLOWBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughan v. WILLOWBROOK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 262 S.W.3d 261, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1131, 2008 WL 3898949 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*262 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laura S. Vaughn (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Willowbrook Condominium Association, Inc. (Respondent) on Appellant’s claim for breach of contract.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact in this case and Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*262 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Laura S. Vaughn (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Willowbrook Condominium Association, Inc. (Respondent) on Appellant’s claim for breach of contract.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact in this case and Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.W.3d 261, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1131, 2008 WL 3898949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-willowbrook-condominium-association-inc-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack