Vaughan v. Wiggins

94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 654, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 455
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 22, 1918
Docket9191
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 813 (Vaughan v. Wiggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughan v. Wiggins, 94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 654, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, relating to alleged newly discovered evidence, is fatally defective, as the affidavit of the witness upon which the ground is based is not supported by the' other affidavits required by section 6086 of the Civil Code (1910).

2. The remaining ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, being disapproved by the trial judge, can not be considered.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 813, 21 Ga. App. 654, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-wiggins-gactapp-1918.