Vaughan v. Vaughan

492 A.2d 1265, 1985 Me. LEXIS 724
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 28, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 492 A.2d 1265 (Vaughan v. Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughan v. Vaughan, 492 A.2d 1265, 1985 Me. LEXIS 724 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Diane Vaughan appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Androscoggin County, that affirmed the denial by the District Court, Lewiston, of her Rule 60(b) motion for partial relief from a divorce judgment. Because the District Court denied her claim of lack of personal jurisdiction in the original divorce hearing, the doctrine of res judicata precludes re-examination of the question. Willette v. Umhoeffer, 268 A.2d 617, 619 (Me.1970). In the post-judgment proceeding presently before us, the appellant failed to establish that she was denied procedural due process or any other basis for relief not previously litigated.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willette v. Umhoeffer
268 A.2d 617 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 A.2d 1265, 1985 Me. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-vaughan-me-1985.