Vaughan v. Vaughan

35 S.E. 650, 111 Ga. 807, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 729
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 5, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. An affidavit to obtain a warrant to dispossess a tenant holding over should be sufficiently definite and certain in the description of the land to enable the sheriff to identify the premises.

2. It was proper to dismiss such a proceeding where the only description of the land was that deponent “is the owner of a certain tract of land in the 201st district G. M. of said county [the county having been previously named]. Said land being a part of the tract known as the 0. B. Vaughan land. . . That deponent has become the owner of said land, that is, so much of said tract as (33) thirty-three acres more or less ; and that deponent desires possession of the said thirty-three (33) acres as has been apportioned to the deponent from said C. B. Vaughan’s estate.”

Orme v. King, 60 Ga. 523. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughan v. Vaughan, 35 S.E. 650, 111 Ga. 807, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 729 (Ga. 1900).

35 S.E. 650 (Vaughan v. Vaughan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brinson v. Ingram
170 S.E.2d 39 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
North v. Tolbert
55 S.E.2d 661 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)