Vaughan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Vaughan v. State

810 S.W.2d 327, 305 Ark. 555, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 292

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 28, 1991·No. RC 91-28·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Ricky Samuel Vaughan, by his attorney, William Isaacs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his failure to timely file the record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such failure, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Ricky Samuel Vaughan, by his attorney, William Isaacs, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to his failure to timely file the record in this court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such failure, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our per curiam dated February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Vaughan v. State, 810 S.W.2d 327, 305 Ark. 555, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 292 (Ark. 1991).

Pincite

810 S.W.2d 327 (Vaughan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related