Vaughan v. McGannon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Vaughan v. McGannon

52 Ark. 244

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

partnership: Pleading: Evidence. If Sanders and McGannon were partners, and the due bill in question was executed by one of them in the name of the partnership business as evidence of a partnership debt, it was the liability of both. No amendment of the plaintiff’s pleadings was necessary to authorize proof of the partnership. The court erred in excluding the testimony relating to that fact.

Reverse and remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

partnership: Pleading: Evidence. If Sanders and McGannon were partners, and the due bill in question was executed by one of them in the name of the partnership business as evidence of a partnership debt, it was the liability of both. No amendment of the plaintiff’s pleadings was necessary to authorize proof of the partnership. The court erred in excluding the testimony relating to that fact.

Reverse and remand.

Vaughan v. McGannon, 52 Ark. 244 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

52 Ark. 244 (Vaughan v. McGannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related