Vaughan v. McCullough

Indiana Supreme Court

Vaughan v. McCullough

28 Ind. 359

DecidedNovember 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Ind. 359 (Vaughan v. McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughan v. McCullough, 28 Ind. 359 (Ind. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, J.

— This was a proceeding in attachment, under the statute of this State, against the steamboat “ Morning Star.” The appellants were substituted as defendants instead of the boat, and final judgment was rendered against them. The judgment must be reversed, for want of jurisdiction in the court below over the subject of the action. Ballard v. Wiltshire, ante, p. 341.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the court below to dismiss the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, J.

— This was a proceeding in attachment, under the statute of this State, against the steamboat “ Morning Star.” The appellants were substituted as defendants instead of the boat, and final judgment was rendered against them. The judgment must be reversed, for want of jurisdiction in the court below over the subject of the action. Ballard v. Wiltshire, ante, p. 341.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the court below to dismiss the case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Ind. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-mccullough-ind-1867.