Vaughan v. Lewis
This text of 108 F. App'x 450 (Vaughan v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
From the facts presented, a rational factfinder could easily have inferred that Vaughan entered the residence with intent to steal. Sufficient evidence therefore [451]*451supported Vaughan’s conviction of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt. See Davis v. Woodford, 333 F.3d 982, 992 (9th Cir.2003). Vaughan’s due process rights were not violated.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 F. App'x 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-lewis-ca9-2004.