Vaughan v. Hollingsworth
218 A.D. 844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·Published
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that there was another action pending between the parties for the same relief, affirmed, without costs, it appearing that since the entry of the order appealed from the former action has been discontinued. (See Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co., 131 N. Y. 636; Beals v. Cameron, 3 How. Pr. 414; Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vaughan v. Hollingsworth, 218 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
218 A.D. 844 (Vaughan v. Hollingsworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Averill v. . Patterson
10 N.Y. 500 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Beals v. Cameron
3 How. Pr. 414 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co.
131 N.Y. 636 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)