Vaughan v. Hollingsworth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vaughan v. Hollingsworth

218 A.D. 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 218 A.D. 844 (Vaughan v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughan v. Hollingsworth, 218 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that there was another action pending between the parties for the same relief, affirmed, without costs, it appearing that since the entry of the order appealed from the former action has been discontinued. (See Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co., 131 N. Y. 636; Beals v. Cameron, 3 How. Pr. 414; Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint on the ground that there was another action pending between the parties for the same relief, affirmed, without costs, it appearing that since the entry of the order appealed from the former action has been discontinued. (See Crossman v. Universal Rubber Co., 131 N. Y. 636; Beals v. Cameron, 3 How. Pr. 414; Averill v. Patterson, 10 N. Y. 500.) Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-hollingsworth-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack