Vaughan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Vaughan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

96 S.E. 13, 22 Ga. App. 401, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 362

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 17, 1918

Docket9284

StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 13 (Vaughan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vaughan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 96 S.E. 13, 22 Ga. App. 401, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The issues of, fact raised by the defendants’ plea, under appropriate instructions from the trial judge, were determined by the jury adversely, to the defendants. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. For none of the reasons assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur. J. P. Brooke, Howell Brooke, II. L. Patterson, for plaintiffs in error. Qeorge'F. Gober, O. L. Harris, W. I. Heyward, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The issues of, fact raised by the defendants’ plea, under appropriate instructions from the trial judge, were determined by the jury adversely, to the defendants. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. For none of the reasons assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur. J. P. Brooke, Howell Brooke, II. L. Patterson, for plaintiffs in error. Qeorge'F. Gober, O. L. Harris, W. I. Heyward, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 S.E. 13, 22 Ga. App. 401, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-farmers-merchants-bank-gactapp-1918.