Vaughan v. Duke

207 S.E.2d 509, 232 Ga. 545, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1001
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1974
Docket28913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 207 S.E.2d 509 (Vaughan v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vaughan v. Duke, 207 S.E.2d 509, 232 Ga. 545, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1001 (Ga. 1974).

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

This appeal is from a temporary injunction which restrains the use of property under a rezoning ordinance which was approved by the Board of County Commissioners. The trial court based its order upon a finding that the public hearing required by the zoning ordinance was invalid because it was attended by only one qualified member of the board.

The board consists of three members. One member was disqualified because of his interest in the subject property. He did not participate in the discussions nor vote upon the rezoning application. However, he was present at the public hearing on November 15, 1972. Of the two qualified members only one was present at the *546 hearing. After the hearing, action on the application was deferred. Thereafter, at a later meeting on December 13, 1972, and without further hearing, the two qualified members of the board approved the application. Held:

Argued June 10, 1974 Decided July 16, 1974. Albert B. Wallace, William R. L. Latson, for appellant. Furman Smith, Jr., for appellees.

The ordinance here requires a public hearing by the Board of Commissioners before the adoption of any proposed zoning amendment. Such public hearing is official business of the board. The law applicable at the time of this public hearing provided: "Two members of the board shall constitute a quorum for the conducting of business . . .” Ga. L. 1968, p. 2580. In our opinion the quorum must be comprised of qualified members. Accordingly, the public hearing on the rezoning application here was invalid because it was held by only one qualified member of the board. Until there is a public hearing the property may not be rezoned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Nebraska Environmental Control Council
509 N.W.2d 21 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1993)
Croaff v. Evans
636 P.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 S.E.2d 509, 232 Ga. 545, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vaughan-v-duke-ga-1974.