Vaughan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Opinion
a BSE □□ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION DAVID B. VAUGHAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:24-CV-119-H-BR COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Dkt. No. 21. No objections were filed, and the plaintiff has taken no action in this case since February 2025. See Dkt. No. 20. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot., 975 F.3d 488, 502 (5th Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The decision of the Social Security Administration Commissioner is affirmed. So ordered on July 14, 2025. em UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vaughan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Vaughan v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.