Vatter v. Kaltenbach

131 A. 900, 102 N.J.L. 470, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 1, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These are appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, overruling demurrers to' alternative writs of mandamus and awarding peremptory writs.

The same questions are raised as in Lutz et al. v. Kaltenbach, post, p. 718, of the present term of this court, and the conclusions reached therein are applicable and controlling herein.

The judgments below are affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vatter v. Kaltenbach, 131 A. 900, 102 N.J.L. 470, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 200 (N.J. 1926).

131 A. 900 (Vatter v. Kaltenbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wyatt v. Metropolitan Maintenance Company
376 A.2d 1222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)