Vatter v. Kaltenbach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Vatter v. Kaltenbach

131 A. 900, 102 N.J.L. 470, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 200

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 1, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A. 900 (Vatter v. Kaltenbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vatter v. Kaltenbach, 131 A. 900, 102 N.J.L. 470, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 200 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These are appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, overruling demurrers to' alternative writs of mandamus and awarding peremptory writs.

The same questions are raised as in Lutz et al. v. Kaltenbach, post, p. 718, of the present term of this court, and the conclusions reached therein are applicable and controlling herein.

The judgments below are affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI