Vassura v. Taylor

496 N.E.2d 233, 68 N.Y.2d 643, 505 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19037
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to dismiss the appeal granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that the stipulation for judgment absolute, under the facts of [644] this case, is illusory and frustrates the very purpose of CPLR 5601 (c) (Goldberg v Elkom Co., 36 NY2d 914).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vassura v. Taylor, 496 N.E.2d 233, 68 N.Y.2d 643, 505 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19037 (N.Y. 1986).

496 N.E.2d 233 (Vassura v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montalvo v. Nel Taxi Corp.
496 N.E.2d 232 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)