Vassura v. Taylor
496 N.E.2d 233, 68 N.Y.2d 643, 505 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19037
This text of 496 N.E.2d 233 (Vassura v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Vassura v. Taylor, 496 N.E.2d 233, 68 N.Y.2d 643, 505 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19037 (N.Y. 1986).
Opinion
Motion to dismiss the appeal granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that the stipulation for judgment absolute, under the facts of [644]*644this case, is illusory and frustrates the very purpose of CPLR 5601 (c) (Goldberg v Elkom Co., 36 NY2d 914).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Montalvo v. Nel Taxi Corp.
496 N.E.2d 232 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
496 N.E.2d 233, 68 N.Y.2d 643, 505 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 19037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassura-v-taylor-ny-1986.