VASSENELLI, NICHOLAS L. v. CITY OF SYRACUSE
This text of VASSENELLI, NICHOLAS L. v. CITY OF SYRACUSE (VASSENELLI, NICHOLAS L. v. CITY OF SYRACUSE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
354 CA 15-01153 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
NICHOLAS L. VASSENELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CITY OF SYRACUSE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND SHARON ERIKSSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, CANASTOTA (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
LAW OFFICES OF BRADY & CARAFA, SYRACUSE (THOMAS P. CARAFA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered March 4, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant Sharon Eriksson to dismiss the amended complaint against her.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the third and fourth causes of action against defendant Sharon Eriksson, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Vassenelli v City of Syracuse ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Apr. 29, 2016]).
Entered: April 29, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
VASSENELLI, NICHOLAS L. v. CITY OF SYRACUSE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassenelli-nicholas-l-v-city-of-syracuse-nyappdiv-2016.