Vassell v. Boatwright
This text of 849 So. 2d 462 (Vassell v. Boatwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the record before us, we agree with the trial court that the former husband failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the dissolution judgment had been procured by the former wife’s fraud. We therefore find no gross abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the decree made pursuant to Rule 1.520(b), Fla. R. Civ. P., and affirm. See LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, N.A, 826 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (whether a relief from judgment should be granted is a fact specific question; trial court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
849 So. 2d 462, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10830, 2003 WL 21659109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassell-v-boatwright-fladistctapp-2003.