Vassell v. Boatwright

849 So. 2d 462, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10830, 2003 WL 21659109
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 2003
DocketNo. 3D03-291
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 849 So. 2d 462 (Vassell v. Boatwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vassell v. Boatwright, 849 So. 2d 462, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10830, 2003 WL 21659109 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we agree with the trial court that the former husband failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the dissolution judgment had been procured by the former wife’s fraud. We therefore find no gross abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the decree made pursuant to Rule 1.520(b), Fla. R. Civ. P., and affirm. See LPP Mortgage Ltd. v. Bank of America, N.A, 826 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (whether a relief from judgment should be granted is a fact specific question; trial court’s ruling should not be disturbed on appeal absent a gross abuse of discretion).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PW Design, Inc. v. Atlanta Fashion, LLC
905 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 So. 2d 462, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10830, 2003 WL 21659109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassell-v-boatwright-fladistctapp-2003.