Vasse v. Spicer

2 U.S. 111
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1790·Published

Opinion

By the Court

—It has been a practice for the plaintiff’s attorney to accept a judgment in the mode proposed by the motion ; but the point, for allowing the defendant’s attorney, either as matter of right, or indulgence, to retract his plea, under such circumstances, has never been brought before the Court on argument. The inconveniency of the delay, where, in fact, there is no dispute, is, however, so palpable, that we cannot give a judicial countenance to the practice. Therefore, let the jury be called.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vasse v. Spicer, 2 U.S. 111 (1790).

2 U.S. 111 (Vasse v. Spicer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.