Vassar Holding Co. v. Dunlap
143 A. 444, 103 N.J. Eq. 363, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 664
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Berry in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, HetI'Teld, Dear, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vassar Holding Co. v. Dunlap, 143 A. 444, 103 N.J. Eq. 363, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 664 (N.J. 1928).
143 A. 444 (Vassar Holding Co. v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Funding Corp. v. Melroy Const. Co.
149 A. 586 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)