Vassallo v. Florida Power & Light Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vassallo v. Florida Power & Light Co.

384 So. 2d 970, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16926

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 24, 1980

DocketNo. 79-676

StatusPublished

This text of 384 So. 2d 970 (Vassallo v. Florida Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vassallo v. Florida Power & Light Co., 384 So. 2d 970, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that the trial court properly directed a verdict for the defendant Florida Power and Light Company and excluded certain evidence at trial because: (a) the plaintiff Lorraine Vassallo and the plaintiff’s decedent Nicholas Vassallo were as a matter of law trespassers or at least uninvited licensees at the time of the subject accident, and (b) the defendant Florida Power and Light Company as landowner did not, as a matter of law, breach its duty to the said plaintiff and plaintiff’s decedent as trespassers or uninvited licensees in this cause. Wood v. Camp, 284 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1973); Hix v. Billen, 284 So.2d 209, 210 (Fla.1973); Bovino v. Metropolitan Dade County, 378 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Libby v. West Coast Rock Co., 308 So.2d 602 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); cert. den. 325 So.2d 6 (Fla.1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that the trial court properly directed a verdict for the defendant Florida Power and Light Company and excluded certain evidence at trial because: (a) the plaintiff Lorraine Vassallo and the plaintiff’s decedent Nicholas Vassallo were as a matter of law trespassers or at least uninvited licensees at the time of the subject accident, and (b) the defendant Florida Power and Light Company as landowner did not, as a matter of law, breach its duty to the said plaintiff and plaintiff’s decedent as trespassers or uninvited licensees in this cause. Wood v. Camp, 284 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1973); Hix v. Billen, 284 So.2d 209, 210 (Fla.1973); Bovino v. Metropolitan Dade County, 378 So.2d 50 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Libby v. West Coast Rock Co., 308 So.2d 602 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); cert. den. 325 So.2d 6 (Fla.1975).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 So. 2d 970, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vassallo-v-florida-power-light-co-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack