VASS v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided April 15, 2022·No. 5:21-cv-00373·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Case No. 5:21-cv-373-MTT-CHW : Deputy Warden ERIC MARTIN, et al., : : Proceedings Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Defendants. : Before the U.S. Magistrate Judge :

ORDER Before the Court is a motion from Plaintiff titled “motion to dismiss court fees as unconstitutional.” (Doc. 24). In the motion, Plaintiff appears to seek to avoid payment of the filing fee for commencing this civil action as contemplated by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) (“After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account”). The PLRA’s filing fee provisions have already withstood constitutional scrutiny as advancing the legitimate governmental interest of “curtail[ing] abusive prisoner tort, civil rights and conditions litigation.” Mitchell v. Farcass, 112 F.3d 1483, 1488 (11th Cir. 1997). None of Plaintiff’s legal or factual theories warrant a different result, and accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to avoid the filing fee (Doc. 24) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 15th day of April, 2022.

s/ Charles H. Weigle Charles H. Weigle United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VASS v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA, (M.D. Ga. 2022).

VASS v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA (VASS v. THE STATE OF GEORGIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Farcass
112 F.3d 1483 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)