Vasquez v. Zenith Travel, Inc.
This text of 14 F. App'x 97 (Vasquez v. Zenith Travel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Luz Vasquez appeals from a grant of summary judgment dismissing her claim that she was illegally discharged in retaliation for making inquiries about her § 401(k) plan balance, in violation of § 510 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1140. She contends, inter alia, that summary judgment was inappropriate because a reasonable factfinder could have found that she was terminated because of those inquiries.
[98]*98We reject Vasquez’s argument. Vasquez’s former employer made a strong showing that it discharged Vasquez because it wanted to automate most of the functions that she performed and because it wanted to hire a staff accountant supervisor. Vasquez did not produce evidence that would permit a reasonable factfinder to find that she was dismissed in retaliation for her inquiries relating to her § 401 (k) plan balance.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F. App'x 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-zenith-travel-inc-ca2-2001.