Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided January 11, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-00612·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ROBERT VENCENT VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. Civ. 20-612 RB/KRS ALISHA TAFOYA-LUCERO, et al., Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (PFRD) by United States Magistrate Judge Kevin Sweazea, entered December 19, 2022. (Doc. 62.) The PFRD recommends denying Plaintiffs Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 55). The parties had until January 3, 2023, to file objections, and no party has filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the PFRD waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 62) are ADOPTED and Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate (Doc. 55) is DENIED.

Geo — SENIOR US. TRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero, (D.N.M. 2023).

Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero (Vasquez v. Tafoya-Lucero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)