Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Vasquez v. State

Vasquez v. State

107 So. 3d 493, 2013 WL 513245, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 356
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 2013
DocketNo. 4D12-4120
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 3d 493 (Vasquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vasquez v. State, 107 So. 3d 493, 2013 WL 513245, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 356 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the Order of Restitution. Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a). Appellant failed to provide any support for her allegation that the restitution in this case was satisfied through a sale of property on which the victim had a lien. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant again seeking relief from the trial court if she can provide adequate support for her allegation that the restitution in this case has been satisfied.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vasquez v. State
133 So. 3d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 So. 3d 493, 2013 WL 513245, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.