Vasquez v. State

829 So. 2d 341, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15674, 2002 WL 31422925
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vasquez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 778 So. 2d 1068
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2002·No. No. 3D02-1879·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As in Ramos v. State, 823 So.2d 265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), the trial court erroneously denied the appellant’s Rule 3.800 claim to credit for time served before sentencing on the ground that required administrative remedies had not been pursued. As the state again agrees, however, such action is required only as to claims to time served post-sentencing. Ramos v. State, 823 So.2d 265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Garcia v. State, 736 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The order is therefore reversed and remanded for an appropriate hearing on the appellant’s motion at which he may prevail if “the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief.” State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998); Ramos, 823 So.2d at 265.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vasquez v. State, 829 So. 2d 341, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15674, 2002 WL 31422925 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 341 (Vasquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. State
823 So. 2d 265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Garcia v. State
736 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)