Vasquez v. New York City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vasquez v. New York City

84 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16070

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.D.2d 837 (Vasquez v. New York City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vasquez v. New York City, 84 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16070 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim, defendant New York City appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.), dated May 20, 1980, which granted the application. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to file a particularized notice of claim with the defendant in accordance with the order of Special Term is extended until 20 days after the service upon her of a copy of the order to be entered herein with notice of entry thereof. Under the circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice, this court affirms the order of Special Term granting leave to the plaintiff to serve a late notice of claim upon the defendant (see Robb v New York City Housing Auth., 71 AD2d 1000). Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim, defendant New York City appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.), dated May 20, 1980, which granted the application. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to file a particularized notice of claim with the defendant in accordance with the order of Special Term is extended until 20 days after the service upon her of a copy of the order to be entered herein with notice of entry thereof. Under the circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice, this court affirms the order of Special Term granting leave to the plaintiff to serve a late notice of claim upon the defendant (see Robb v New York City Housing Auth., 71 AD2d 1000). Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.2d 837, 449 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-new-york-city-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack