Vasquez v. MobileShack Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SILVAYN VAZQUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, 19 Civ. 10371 (PAE) (GWG) ~ ORDER MOBILESHACK INC.,, et al., Defendants.
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On May 10, 2022, plaintiffs submitted a stipulation of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)\(ii) against defendants First Class Wireless Inc., International Cellular Inc., BestBuy Wireless Inc., Express Mobile, Inc., Cellular Stop Inc., Cellular Stop IT, Inc., WorldWide Mobile, Inc., Mobilecom Inc., International Mobile, Inc., Repair City Inc., Wireless World of Manhattan Inc., and Cellular To Go, Ltd. Dkt. 114. This is a case brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Parties cannot privately settle FLSA claims with prejudice absent the approval of the district court or the Department of Labor. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 200 (2d Cir. 2015). In this case, plaintiffs, however, have stipulated to a dismissal of this case without prejudice. Further, plaintiffs have informed the Court that no settlement exists between plaintiffs and the parties to be dismissed. Dkt. 107. The Court therefore need not review the terms of any settlement under Cheeks. See 796 F.3d at 201 n.2 (leaving for another day the question of whether parties may settle such cases and dismiss without prejudice without approval of the district court or the Department of Labor). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the above-listed defendants.
SO ORDERED. fo ft en 4 fo. 4 / f : (- fhoskes ; POAAA A). CP BM Paul A. Engelmayer J / United States District Judge
Dated: May 11, 2022 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vasquez v. MobileShack Inc. (Vasquez v. MobileShack Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.