Vasquez v. Merit Systems Protection Board

137 F. App'x 335
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2005
Docket2004-3388
StatusUnpublished

This text of 137 F. App'x 335 (Vasquez v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vasquez v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 137 F. App'x 335 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Vasquez appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, which dismissed his appeal as untimely and for lack of jurisdiction. Vasquez v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., DE3443030425-I-1 (MSPB Sept. 23, 2003). We affirm.

Vasquez claims that in 1987 he took an air traffic controller examination that was stolen from him and given to someone else to sign. Vasquez faded to file an appeal to the board until July 23, 2003, sixteen years after the incident allegedly occurred. In an attempt to cure this defect, Vasquez submitted two appeal forms to the board that were dated 1986 and 1987. It is apparent from the face of these documents, however, that they are not authentic. Because we affirm the board’s holding that Vasquez’s appeal was untimely filed, see Stahl v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 83 F.3d 409, 413 (Fed.Cir.1996) (appeal to the board must meet the timeliness requirement in 5 C.F.R. § 1201.22(b)), we do not address the board’s alternate holding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joanne C. Stahl v. Merit Systems Protection Board
83 F.3d 409 (Federal Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 F. App'x 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2005.