Vasquez v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vasquez v. Medina

49 A.D.3d 547, 851 N.Y.2d 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 547 (Vasquez v. Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vasquez v. Medina, 49 A.D.3d 547, 851 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the trial court based upon the best interests of the child, and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Cashel v Cashel, 46 AD3d 501 [2007]). Here, the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record to promote the best interests of the child by denying the father visitation. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the trial court based upon the best interests of the child, and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Cashel v Cashel, 46 AD3d 501 [2007]). Here, the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record to promote the best interests of the child by denying the father visitation. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.3d 547, 851 N.Y.2d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-v-medina-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack