Vasquez v. Medina
49 A.D.3d 547, 851 N.Y.2d 889
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the trial court based upon the best interests of the child, and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Cashel v Cashel, 46 AD3d 501 [2007]). Here, the Family Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record to promote the best interests of the child by denying the father visitation. Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Garni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vasquez v. Medina, 49 A.D.3d 547, 851 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 547 (Vasquez v. Medina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rhodie v. Nathan
67 A.D.3d 687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)