Vasquez, Teresa v. Polukoff, M.D., Gerald

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 13, 2000
Docket13-99-00586-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Vasquez, Teresa v. Polukoff, M.D., Gerald (Vasquez, Teresa v. Polukoff, M.D., Gerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vasquez, Teresa v. Polukoff, M.D., Gerald, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-99-586-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

TERESA VASQUEZ, Appellant,

v.

GERALD POLUKOFF, M.D., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, TERESA VASQUEZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 96-3580-A. The clerk's record was filed on December 6, 1999. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on January 5, 2000. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On January 26, 2000, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 13th day of April, 2000

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vasquez, Teresa v. Polukoff, M.D., Gerald, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-teresa-v-polukoff-md-gerald-texapp-2000.