Vasquez-Merced v. Piovanetti-Lopez

243 A.D.2d 331, 662 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9885
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Judith Sheindlin, J.), entered June 28, 1995, which dismissed respondent’s application for a downward modification of child support, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Family Court correctly held that the parties’ stipulation, approved by the Superior Court of Puerto Rico in August 1994, resolved any issues raised by respondent’s application for downward modification made in March 1994. In any event, even if we were to deem the instant application as one newly made after approval of the stipulation (cf, Matter of Funt v Funt, 65 NY2d 893), we would find no change in respondent’s circumstances since that time warranting a downward modification. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vasquez-Merced v. Piovanetti-Lopez, 243 A.D.2d 331, 662 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 331 (Vasquez-Merced v. Piovanetti-Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dukes v. White
295 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)