Vasquez Martinez v. Holder
This text of 313 F. App'x 990 (Vasquez Martinez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor Hugo Vasquez Martinez and Maria Teresa Bernardino Perez, married natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se [991]*991for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal' from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying-relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
Petitioners’ contention that the agency violated due process in their case by not considering the equities and by misapplying the law to the facts is unsupported by the record and therefore does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. Id.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F. App'x 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vasquez-martinez-v-holder-ca9-2009.